Hi, On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 15:29:33 -0400, Isaac Dupree wrote: > it would be nice if they were nice under Linux! [warning: frustrated > rant ahead]
Ranting can be good! However, not having much experience with Thunderbird or GNOME, I'm not sure I understand your pain. If any of these might be darcs's fault, or things darcs could be smarter about, could you please file a bug report? Also, does this mean you get the same symptoms of I do under Windows of having MIME-gunk in the message body, and a weird filename for the patch bundle when you receive the mail? > The main benefit I actually get from using 'darcs send's e-mail > support (rather than -o to a file) is that it fills in the target > e-mail address I should send to, fetched from the source repo's _darcs > IIRC -- anyway, something I'd rather not look up and enter myself. Btw, you can now do darcs send -O, which generates a patch bundle name for you. > Long ago I tried various command-line email things like ssmtp, which > never worked out very well: and anyway I shouldn't have to configure > anything like that when I have my settings already stored in > Thunderbird(which unfortunately hoards them and isn't a very > well-behaved program in general) Trent Buck submitted a feature request that you may also be interested in: http://bugs.darcs.net/issue906 -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
pgpzlXIs1aJ0S.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
