(Removing David Roundy from the Cc: line.) On Aug 1, 2008, at 7:16 AM, Eric Kow wrote:
> Here is my attempt at doing some profiling for http:// > bugs.darcs.net/issue973 Nice work! > Old summary > ----------- > total time = 7.60 secs (380 ticks @ 20 ms) > total alloc = 1,563,749,084 bytes (excludes profiling overheads) > > Hashed summary > -------------- > total time = 8.08 secs (404 ticks @ 20 ms) > total alloc = 1,601,899,712 bytes (excludes profiling overheads) > > Darcs 2 summary > --------------- > total time = 7.88 secs (394 ticks @ 20 ms) > total alloc = 1,601,439,880 bytes (excludes profiling overheads) So, if I understand correctly "darcs whatsnew" on a GHC repo with no changes takes 7.60 seconds with old-fashioned-inventory format and 8.08 seconds with hashed-format. Is it this added 0.48 seconds which is what deterred the GHC developers from switching to hashed format? Or did they experience significantly worse slowdowns on their systems (Windows) and their workflows (perhaps lots of unrecorded changes?). Also, could anyone state why the GHC developers didn't switch to darcs-2-format? Thanks! Regards, Zooko _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
