Arg.  As you can tell I sent this patch with the buggy version it would
seem.  I'll try to resend.

Jason

On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 10:32 PM, Jason Dagit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> David,
>
> This patch is a merge of the work I've been doing and your patch:
>
> Tue Aug  5 09:57:40 PDT 2008  David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  * fix remove_from_unrevert_context
>
> Unfortunately, when I put it all together I get a version of darcs that
> happily corrupts repositories.  There is a long story behind why I've
> merged the two patches, but let's just say, I used the resulting buggy
> darcs on accident and after a lot of frustration this is what we have.
>
> I'm too tired to debug it tonight, but maybe I can figure out what is
> wrong in the morning.  What it seems to do is to either read or
> write (I'm not sure which) only part of patches.  It's as if it
> reads half of every hunk patch instead of processing the whole thing.
>
> What I'm sending here is the least I could put together that triggered
> the bad behavior.
>
> Thanks,
> Jason
>
> Tue Aug  5 22:22:54 PDT 2008  Jason Dagit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>  * buggy code: only partially process hunks
>
>
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users

Reply via email to