Applied. Thanks! David
On Wed, Aug 06, 2008 at 12:47:24PM +0000, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi David, > > It seems like we could tune the patch theory appendix to be a little > friendlier to formally minded folk. > > Several people, who would otherwise be very interested in patch theory, > have said that they were turned off by the introduction to this chatper. > I don't want to put words in your mouth, but do you think we could work > on them a little bit? Here is a first stab. > > Cheers, > > Eric > > P.S. this was motivated by an IRC conversation, where-in somebody > mentioned his friend who hates darcs because it "it made slightly over > the top claims about the theory of patches" and was a little "fast and > loose" with the math. It also echos some conversations I've had with > mathy friends in the past. > > > Wed Aug 6 13:34:11 BST 2008 Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * Make patch theory intro more inviting to math people. > > Wed Aug 6 13:41:09 BST 2008 Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * Downplay quantum mechanics link. > Besides, darcs has far more than 3 users by now. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
