On Tue, Aug 5, 2008 at 11:01 PM, Adrian Hey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I take it you mean as the perfect example of how to kill off interest in > your own project :-) I can't help thinking this was so obviously going > to happen that it must have been Davids intent at the time he wrote > that announcement. The only doubt I have is whether he was just in a > grumpy mood at the time and now regrets this, or whether he still feels > this way.
Yes, that's the idea. I don't believe that darcs has enough developer interest and time to continue support at an adequate level (e.g. for windows), and I think it's a good idea for users to know this so they can make an informed choice when deciding whether to use darcs. I still think this is true. Eric is more optimistic, I think. I especially didn't want users to make the mistake of assuming that because darcs 2 was released (and 2.0.2) that bugs in darcs would continue to be fixed. David _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
