Eric Kow wrote: > New submission from Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > People just resort to darcs changes -v. And the output isn't very nice, > apparently. > > It may be worth considering a rewrite/rethink.
There is an inconsistency here between darcs changes -v and darcs annotate. For file differences darcs changes -v is faster than darcs annotate (for substantially different information as it is missing the line by line breakdown), but for patch differences darcs annotate --match "hash ..." is (much) faster than darcs changes -v --match "hash ..." (for substantially similar information with the differences being colorization and change log notation versus darcs patch notation). So obviously there appears, from a user perspective, performance enhancements in _both_ commands that aren't applied to the other. -- --Max Battcher-- http://www.worldmaker.net/ _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
