On Tue, Aug 12, 2008 at 2:03 PM, Claus Reinke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Much as I'd have liked to advocate darcs 2 over git for ghc, I > couldn't really have justified that until the little bugs are known to > be fixed. A number of git commands are implemented as crufty shell scripts that don't check the results of running its plumbing commands. I've been bitten by silent command failure on a number of occasions. Just saying. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
