On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:53:27AM -0700, Jason Dagit wrote: > On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 10:35 AM, David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 09:56:32AM -0700, Jason Dagit wrote: > >> David, > >> > >> This is the resend you requested. > >> > >> I can't be sure that the individal patches below will compile by > >> themselves, but > >> I know they result in a working darcs when applied together. Hopefully, > >> sending like this will make it easier for you to review them! > > > > I know it's a lot of work, but breaking these into managable chunks > > that *will* compile may be the only way to get this actually > > reviewed. And this really is important, because I'm pretty confident > > that in a change of this magnitude, there *will* be bugs present. And > > the type witness don't really help us in this, because most of the > > code involved uses functions with wrong type witnesses--which is to > > say, the functions in Darcs.Repository, which cannot be written with > > correct type witnesses until we've got something that can handle > > mutable state. Which means that the code need to be reviewed, and > > therefore needs to be presented in a comprehensible format. > > > > This one still has a conflict in it, so I can't apply this one without > > the resolution patch--which isn't labelled. > > It's in the bundle: > > Tue Aug 26 21:13:21 PDT 2008 Jason Dagit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * fix conflicts with get_extra changes
I found it right after I sent this message, and felt pretty stupid. :( Sorry! David _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
