On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 1:18 PM, David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 11:48:40PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> sorry about unwieldly big bundle, the last 4 patches are the interesting 
>> part:
>> the rest got pulled in by dependencies...
>>
>> Now, since I'm already running around Cache, HashedIO and friends with a 
>> broom,
>> I have removed most of the [DarcsFlag] instances in there, with the finding
>> that the only thing that's actually used down the stack is "NoCompress". I 
>> have
>> converted these to use a dedicated type. Hopefully, that's a step in right
>> direction... (At very least, it documents what is needed where.)
>>
>> I would generally like to push [DarcsFlag] use as high in the stack as
>> reasonably possible, hopefully all the way to the UI layer. The core has no
>> business dealing with that kind of wholesale information. (If noone minds, 
>> I'd
>> go on with stripping [DarcsFlag] from smart_diff, as that looks like a good
>> target to me -- a purely intuitive selection, though...)
>
> Applied.  Thanks!  (And I'd want to do a behavior change in
> smart_diff, so if you can wait on that until we've had time to talk,
> that would be great.)

I just pulled and recorded a patch on top of my local changes to fix
the conflicts and I'm about to resend my patches (just waiting for the
test suite to pass).

Jason
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users

Reply via email to