It certainly happened twice in a row. But I've now updated to version "2.02 + 76 patches" and it didn't happen. So let's provisionally assume that it was a 2.0.1rc2 problem.
Simon | -----Original Message----- | From: Ian Lynagh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Sent: 05 September 2008 22:38 | To: [email protected]; Simon Peyton-Jones | Subject: Re: [darcs-devel] [issue1061] A new darcs2 bug | | | Hi Simon, | | On Fri, Sep 05, 2008 at 09:31:05PM -0000, Simon Peyton-Jones wrote: | > | > == running darcs pull -av --repodir libraries/base | > Identifying repository http://darcs.haskell.org/packages/base inventory | > Reading inventory of repository c:/simonpj/darcs/HEAD/libraries/base inventory | > Pulling from "http://darcs.haskell.org/packages/base";... | > darcs2.exe: failed to read patch in get_extra: | > Thu Sep 4 21:28:45 GMT Daylight Time 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | > * Don't define __hscore_s_issock on Windows | > Thu Sep 4 21:28:45 GMT Daylight Time 2008 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | > * Don't define __hscore_s_issock on Windows | > Couldn't parse file http://darcs.haskell.org/packages/base/_darcs/patches/20080904202845- | 3fd76-10ad5123c439c488e6d6db859a2d0819d8b1ed0a.gz | > Perhaps this is a 'partial' repository? | > darcs failed: 256 at ./darcs-all line 67. | > sh-2.04$ darcs2 --version | > 2.0.1rc2 (2.0.1rc2 (+ -1 patch)) | > sh-2.04$ | | Is this repeatable? It's the sort of thing that I can imagine could | happen if darcs fails to download a file from darcs.haskell.org. | | | Thanks | Ian | _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
