On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 08:47:11 -0400, David Roundy wrote: > But you probably don't run darcs check on a machine with ghc 6.6, so > you'd probably be in danger of letting patches through that would > break darcs on my machines. Better to make the code track a slow > track that involves two tests (yours and mine), and preferably also a > set of buildbot tests. With that in place, we'd have some degree of > confidence that stable is not going to be less stable than unstable.
Sounds good to me! -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
