On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 08:10:51 -0400, David Roundy wrote: > >> +#ifdef WIN32 > >> +path_separator = '\\' > >> +#else > >> +path_separator = '/' > >> +#endif > > > > Due to 64 bit Windows, it may be a good idea to rename it our WIN32 > > ifdef to just WINDOWS and darcs mv src/win32 as well. > > We could, but as far as I know, the API is still called win32. Does > ghc support the creation of 64 bit windows code?
Comments, Simon? > > Maybe we should create a System.Posix.Signals in src/win32? > > Not a bad idea, but probably it should be a secondary refactor. Another thought I had after sending this. Instead of having a single Workaround module, maybe we could have an entire module hierarchy, the goal being to make it very ease to see what exactly we are trying to work around, for example import Workaround.System.Posix.Signals or import Workaround.Control.Exception (although this is now obsolete in the recent refactor) -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
