On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 05:21:18PM -0700, Eric Kow wrote: > Fri Sep 26 00:58:01 BST 2008 Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * Resolve issue1102: Ignore future 'junk' fields in patch logs. > > This patch provides some forward-compatibility with a feature that is > planned for a future release of darcs. > > On 2008-09-17 David submitted the following patch > resolve issue27: add junk to patch identifiers. > which will not be included the darcs 2.1.0 feature-freeze. The patch > in question adds some extra 'junk' to the patch log in order to minimise > the risk of a patch-id collision. > > This patch was obtained by unrecording David's patch and reverting the > parts that generate the junk, leaving behind only the parts that hide > the junk from view. > > Fri Sep 26 00:59:36 BST 2008 Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * Fix conflict between issue27 and issue1102 patches.
Why not simply use rollback? This is indeed what it's designed for, and it works perfectly for this purpose. David _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
