On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 03:52:37PM -0700, Eric Kow wrote: > Here is a hopefully cleaner attempt to rollback (and unrollback) the issue27 > patches, using a multi-patch rollback and amend-record > > Fri Sep 26 23:01:19 BST 2008 Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * Resolve issue1102: recognise but do not generate patch log 'junk'. > > This is a partial rollback of the two issue27 patches below. The patches > exist > to (a) generate patch log 'junk' and (b) hide such junk from users' view. > Because of a feature freeze, we do not want junk generation to be part of > darcs > 2.1; however, we do anticipate junk-generation being part of subsequent > versions of darcs. To avoid users being confused by this future junk, we > only > rollback the junk-generation part, retaining the junk-hiding part. > > rolling back: > > Wed Sep 17 16:46:57 BST 2008 David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * resolve issue27: add junk to patch identifiers. > > Wed Sep 17 18:09:13 BST 2008 David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * hokey fix to allow unit tests to generate random input. > > > Fri Sep 26 23:25:22 BST 2008 Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * Restore issue27 patches. > > rolling back: > > Fri Sep 26 23:01:19 BST 2008 Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * Resolve issue1102: recognise but do not generate patch log 'junk'.
Thanks, this is much cleaner. Applied! David _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
