On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 6:43 PM, Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 29, 2008 at 18:38:00 +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote: >> Attached is fix for issue1105 and test. I am not very happy with it. >> IMHO code became more complex. Suggestions how to make it better or >> fix the bug another way are welcomed. > > Just a quick question: is it just the defaults we're checking here?
Yes, just defaults. > > Because darcs get --hashed of an old-fashioned repository (on the > command line, no defaults) simply generates an old-fashioned repository. > Does this patch fix this? (It's possible the test is not aggressive > enough) The patch fixes only issue1105. Is there an open issue for the bug you describe? Regards, Dmitry > > -- > Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> > PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9 > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQFI4OmDBUrOwgisBPkRAk7JAJ9njjwky9FG9A4Qwzv99VxlSpeO2gCgoVuc > 5AnJpjjKIF5i8z4BS2R2ZjM= > =q42g > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
