Yes, it's missing. From Tommy's description it looks like it's probably a correct fix, so hopefully he can resend soon. :) Thanks, Tommy!
David On Fri, Oct 03, 2008 at 11:41:02PM -0700, Jason Dagit wrote: > Is it just me, or is the actual patch bundle missing here? > > Jason > PS. I hope it's missing as I'm not ready to be crazy, yet. > > On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 4:48 PM, Tommy Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This fix being in Darcs/Patch/ makes me a bit uncomfortable, but > > it should be rather straight forward. From reading the code for > > partitionRL it is clear it puts the interesting (common, in this > > case) patches to the right, but patchset_intersection wrongly > > picked the left side (which would have been the complement of > > common patches from one of the sets). > > > > > > Sat Oct 4 01:12:44 CEST 2008 Tommy Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * resolve issue1111: use correct side of return from partitionRL > > > > Sat Oct 4 01:03:23 CEST 2008 Tommy Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * use longer patch names in issue1111 test for safer grep result > > The 'not grep C out' found the author--date line of patch A, which > > contained my timezone (CEST), so the test failed even when it should have > > succeeded. > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > darcs-users mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users -- David Roundy http://www.darcs.net _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
