To be honest, I don't actually understand the difference (as far as implementation goes) - I just monkeyed around with the code from diff until it worked. So I can't really speak either way.
-steve On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 11:50 AM, David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm wondering if we would be better of with a simpler patch that > doesn't include the --store-in-memory option? I don't think darcs dist > is such a performance-critical command that we need to give the user > the option of speeding it up at the cost of some memory use. Unless > you're thinking that with a more flexible dist, it could be used for > perfomance-critical purposes? _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
