Matthias Kilian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > - Therefore, the complaint in the first URL you mentioned has a point > (--help, or -? should produce *short* output). I'm not even sure > wether the advanced options should be printed by darcs at all > (this stuff belongs into the manpage).
+1. The current help output is too long. Advanced help should be moved to something like darcs help --advanced foo or darcs foo --full-help, or ommitted entirely. (Obviously the normal --help output would mention that this extended resource existed, and refer the user to it.) > - Usage output (be it via --help, -?, --gimmeaclue) should be written to > stdout, not to stderr -- AFAIK this isn't an issue for darcs, but I > hate it *so much* if I've to type something like > > foo --help 2>&1 | more > > for some `foo' tool that I mention it here ;-) +1. BTDTBTTS. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
