On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 03:12:38PM +0200, Florent Becker wrote: > Once more, with the attchment > > Wed Oct 8 12:05:51 CEST 2008 Florent Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * refactor of SelectChanges > > Wed Oct 8 14:22:24 CEST 2008 Florent Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * added a --lazy-deps option > This option means that you don't get asked about patches which do not match > a --match, but are depended upon by a patch that does. These patches will > get > ilently selected. > > > Wed Oct 8 14:49:56 CEST 2008 Florent Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * basic tests for --lazy-deps
On the whole it looks fine (not that I've really had time to review it carefully), but we definitely need a better flag than --lazy-deps. Maybe --implicit-deps or --dont-prompt-for-dependencies? The latter is awfully long, but does actually describe what you've implemented. David _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
