On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 17:57:29 +1100, Trent W. Buck wrote: > Unfortunately, release/openssl_ok indicates that correspondents were > agreeing to exceptions, but not an actual license! I think this means > we need to talk to everyone who has worked on Darcs so far, and get them > to agree to license their work under the terms of GPL-2 or higher, with > the exceptions mentioned in release/openssl_ok.
Oh boy! Is there any chance we can leave the super-yes people alone, i.e. people who say something to the effect of "I am willing to let the community or at least David Roundy" decide? If we are going to do something like this, we should try to make it a lot easier on oursleves in the future and request (those who are willing) to assign copyright or whatever it takes to make reduce the paperwork. > Eric, would you like to schedule a meeting to discuss this in IRC? I'm > in the +1100 timezone at the moment, and I'm available all weekend. I will be travelling until Thursday. I expect to be online and doing some darcs stuff, but there may be some disruptions, at least over the weekend. Sorry for that! Perhaps next weekend? -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
pgpF248AYJehC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
