Hi Tommy, On Sun, Oct 05, 2008 at 15:44:47 +0200, Tommy Pettersson wrote: > Here is a fix for issue864 -- sort of.
Do you still want these patches to be reviewed / go in? Thanks! > Sun Oct 5 01:57:19 CEST 2008 Tommy Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * resolve issue864: check non-force replace against pending > The replace was checked against pure pristine, so the answer to if it could > be applied to pending without force was sometimes wrong. > > Sun Oct 5 02:03:16 CEST 2008 Tommy Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * make replace safe (again) > If the new token exists in either pending or working, the force flag must > be used, because otherwise some unrecorded changes may be destroyed when > those tokens are modified to allow the replace. > > Sun Oct 5 02:52:23 CEST 2008 Tommy Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * rewrite issue864 test to check for the real cause of the bug -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
pgpEEZH443W2K.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
