> On the other hand, using darcs to manage terabytes of data is probably > not a good idea at the moment. Perhaps something like rsync or > Unison is what you are looking for?
Thanks, I'll check them. But what I'm looking for in is one of powerful features of Darcs: its repositories are distributed. That means if I have 3 computers, I can synchronize between them as I want (1 <-> 2, 1 <-> 3 or 2 <-> 3 at any time). Also Darcs tracks moving of files inside of the working copy. So I thought to use Darcs without its history keeping feature. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
