On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 1:30 AM, Ganesh Sittampalam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Oct 2008, Eric Kow wrote:
>
>> So my preference is for a raw cabal file (that we can exploit
>> straightaway) and in the repository root (where most people expect it).
>> On the other hand, I would certainly rather have a darcs.cabal.in than
>> no darcs.cabal at all :-) (and since it's just the version number, this
>> is not such a big deal)
>
> This seems like something that should be treated like
> configure.ac/configure - auto-generate the file, but make sure it's always
> there in distributions.

Precisely.

David
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users

Reply via email to