On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 11:37:14 -0400, David Roundy wrote: > I'm not entirely clear. Why do we want to roll this back?
Because we already have a patch that creates darcs.cabal.in, whereas the patch that's being rolled back creates darcs.cabal. Of course, I still (think I) prefer a darcs.cabal, but that's a separate question :-) -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
