On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 7:48 AM, Reinier Lamers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have to confess that I hadn't thought very hard about the case that > a user would specify overlapping paths (which, as I understand it, is > where the problem lies). > > But with darcs-2 semantics, two identical primitive patches just add > up to one copy of that change, right? It's still heavily broken on > darcs-1 repos of course.
That's how darcs-2 would treat the changes if you merged them, but you didn't merge them, you concatenated them, which is just wrong. Even darcs-2 can't give right answers if you provide it with wrong input. David _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
