On Sun, Nov 02, 2008 at 07:25:31 -0500, David Roundy wrote:
> Applied, thanks! And next time it'd be even better if you could pull over
> into a copy of darcs-unstable and deal with the conflicts before pushing!

Will do.

> We ought to have a policy on which sort of darcs replace
> to use on our Haskell files.  I would prefer to restrict ourselves to
> tokens lacking in '.' and '-', since that's the Haskell definition of a
> token, and if we don't do that then code like map (lines.liftM) won't get
> replaced properly.

Ok, I have updated
  http://wiki.darcs.net/index.html/DeveloperGettingStarted
accordingly (trying to get us in the self-documentation habit)

-- 
Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow>
PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users

Reply via email to