On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 2:01 AM, Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 01:54:58 -0800, Trent W. Buck wrote:
>> Since I find it hard to believe anyone but David would bother
>> installing GHC *inside* wine, I'm inclined to believe that nobody else
>> has actually run "make disttest" since Franchise was added -- or if
>> they ran it, they didn't actually read the output.
>
> This was likely my case, as I use make disttest as part of the fire and
> forget staging repo for pushing patches to stable.
>
> David: do you think we could move the franchise test from darcs into
> franchise (i.e. maybe franchise could do a lazy get of darcs?)  This
> still gives you a chance to make sure the franchise stuff is working,
> without annoying everybody else (I say this after fielding my third
> complaint about make disttest)

I suspect the version of quick check that is recommended by the
disttest is an unmaintained version.  I recently reinstalled my
ghc6.8.3 after trying out 6.10 (which rudely uninstalled 6.8.3).  So I
just now installed QC 2.1 from hackage using cabal-install.  I don't
see a 2.0 release on hackage in fact.  This lead to compile errors
about 'quickCheck'.  I then remembered I had a local repo of 2.0 so I
installed that, problem fixed.

Next I investigated the repo mentioned in disttest.  It says to get:
http://darcs.haskell.org/QuickCheck

Checking the cabal file in that repo it is indeed version 2.0.
Checking on hackage for version 2.1:
Home page http://www.haskell.org/QuickCheck/

Which gives a 404.

But, the most recent copy on hackage is 2.1.something, and it gives this page:
http://www.cs.chalmers.se/~koen/

Where I couldn't actually find a darcs repo for QC.  This is a weird
situation, not exactly our fault, but I think it's fair to say that we
should try to be compatible with both 2.0 and 2.1.  Many people will
try to cabal-install, I reckon.

I've emailed the author asking him if 2.0 was a valid release, since
it's missing from hackage, and also asking where is the official
repository these days.

Thanks,
Jason
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users

Reply via email to