I'll apply the tests (as soon as they pass), but I'll need help to
review this patch and understand how it works, and what are the
potential risks and pitfalls in applying it.

Many thanks!  (And great to have you with us in the sprint.
Hope to see in March, and that you'd be willing to take on
more jobs in the meantime... :-D)

On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 23:36:07 +0100, Reinier Lamers wrote:
> Sun Oct 26 17:40:09 CET 2008  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   * add a get_unrecorded_in_files to check for unrecorded changes in a subset 
> of working directory
> 
> Sun Oct 26 20:06:12 CET 2008  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   * make get_unrecorded_private work with type witnesses again
> 
> Sun Oct 26 20:46:36 CET 2008  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>   * make whatsnew use the lstat-saving functions to scan the working copy
> 
> Fri Oct 31 22:59:44 CET 2008  Reinier Lamers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   * hopefully less buggy version of get_unrecorded_in_files
> 
> Mon Nov  3 22:11:12 CET 2008  Reinier Lamers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   * Try a bit harder to hack darcs pathname canonicalization in tests
> 
> Mon Nov  3 23:19:41 CET 2008  Reinier Lamers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   * Fix "make bugs" target in makefile
> 
> Mon Nov  3 23:21:06 CET 2008  Reinier Lamers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   * Add bug script for issue1196
> 
> Mon Nov  3 23:25:52 CET 2008  Reinier Lamers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>   * add yet another braindead file path to file path canonicalization test
> _______________________________________________
> darcs-users mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users


-- 
Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow>
PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users

Reply via email to