* Trent W. Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [081129 06:12]:
> Before:
> 
> | Display unrecorded changes in the working copy.
> |[...]
> | whatsnew gives you a view of what changes you've made in your working
> | copy that haven't yet been recorded.  The changes are displayed in
> | darcs patch format. Note that --look-for-adds implies --summary usage.
> 
> After:
> 
> | List unrecorded changes in the working tree.
> | [...]
> | The `darcs whatsnew' command lists unrecorded changes to the working
> | tree.  If you specify a set of files and directories, only unrecorded
> | changes to those files and directories are listed.
> |
> | With the --summary option, the changes are condensed to one line per
> | file, with mnemonics to indicate the nature and extent of the change.
> | The --look-for-adds option causes candidates for `darcs add' to be
> | included in the summary output.
> |
> | By default, `darcs whatsnew' uses Darcs' internal format for changes.
> | To see some context (unchanged lines) around each change, use the
> | --unified option.  To view changes in conventional `diff' format, use
> | the `darcs diff' comand; but note that `darcs whatsnew' is faster.
> |
> | This command exits unsuccessfully (returns a non-zero exit status) if
> | there are no unrecorded changes.
> 


OK! Much better imho.

Thanks,

Christian

-- 
You may use my gpg key for replies:
pub  1024D/47F79788 2005/02/02 Christian Kellermann (C-Keen)

Attachment: pgpepVdyl5SwS.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users

Reply via email to