Hi, "Josef Svenningsson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Despite its warts I think put should stay and remain documented. It > fills a small but important niche. But feel free to document the > warts. for me, put is buggy to the point of being actually counter-productive. Every time so far trying to use put amounted to two darcs processes hanging doing nothing, one on local end and one on the server. I somehow don't see how that helps users with anything... So I am strongly in favour of either removing it completely or at least hiding it, or at *very* least, stating in the documentation that it doesn't work at all in some cases (which?).
On the other hand, it might be that the command is just so inefficient that it fails to do anything in some 30 minutes after which I always kill it, obtaining empty repository at the remote end? Well, no matter, it might be that it works for others. But I'd like to see more opinions on this problem (as opposed to just being slow). Yours, Petr. -- Peter Rockai | me()mornfall!net | prockai()redhat!com http://blog.mornfall.net | http://web.mornfall.net "In My Egotistical Opinion, most people's C programs should be indented six feet downward and covered with dirt." -- Blair P. Houghton on the subject of C program indentation _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
