On Sun, Dec 07, 2008 at 17:22:59 +0100, Christian Kellermann wrote: > I have been needing this in the past where you hack away at code > and because of the flow you forget recording in between.
I haven't yet looked at this patch. It sounds like a useful thing to have, although it does add yet another command to our interactive user interface. I'm inclined to accept this. Maybe something like ---- end of already selected changes ---- for the marker > Shall I record this change? (1/4) [ynWsfvplxdaqjk], or ? for help: y > hunk ./foo 9 > -fourth line > +some OTHER feature! > Shall I record this change? (2/4) [ynWsfvplxdaqjk], or ? for help: y > hunk ./foo 13 > -third line > +blabla > Shall I record this change? (3/4) [ynWsfvplxdaqjk], or ? for help: l > Already selected changes: > hunk ./foo 9 > -fourth line > +some OTHER feature! > hunk ./foo 3 > -third line > +Wow look ma! > ---- done ---- > hunk ./foo 13 > -third line > +blabla > Shall I record this change? (3/4) [ynWsfvplxdaqjk], or ? for help: > [...] -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
