On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 00:20:01 +0100, Petr Rockai wrote: > The obvious problem with my current patch is the way replaceInFL works, > relying > on PatchInfo equality on the repaired patches. I unfortunately haven't had > time > to verify that this is always true, or whether we really want to enforce this > as a policy.
It seems like a simple way to do this safely might be to keep both the original and the repaired version of the repaired patch. This way we can do a full comparison, maybe even using patch info to start with. -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
pgpSRkbiV94VV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
