On Fri, Jan 16, 2009 at 6:54 PM, Kari Hoijarvi <hoija...@seas.wustl.edu> wrote:
> Darcs 1 conflicts with identical changes , darcs 2 does not. I think darcs 2 > does the intuitive good thing, but I haven't thought what are the > consequences when you unrecord such patches, I haven't used darcs2 enough to > run to such situation. Time will tell, I use unrecord a lot when > prototyping. I'm a bit surprised that darcs 2 decided to support confluence, given how that is controversial and poorly matches the operation-based model. Can we have implementer's view on what's going to happen with unrecord? Cheers, JP. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
