Trent W. Buck wrote: > That would mean that *everyone* involved in the project has to use a > structure editor. IME there is very little that people will fight for > MORE than the right to use their preferred editor :-) > That's true, but I don't think that's really an issue. Once you get all the advantages that a really good IDE brings, it's hard to go back.
A bigger problem is the huge amount of text based tools programmers have created. Making a great IDE based solely on tree representation requires you to implement really good counterparts from scratch, an enormous task. Kari _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
