On Fri, Jan 23, 2009 at 13:07:44 +1100, Trent W. Buck wrote:
> Currently, it seems like all the .hs files are compiled twice -- once
> for libHSDarcs and once for the darcs(1) binary.
> 
> How much effort is involved in having Cabal build libHSDarcs, compiling
> all (or most of) the .hs files, then just having a "stub" darcs.hs that
> links against libHSDarcs?

Is the same request as our Cabal wishlist item "Avoid recompiling common
code between libdarcs and the darcs binary"?

 * http://wiki.darcs.net/index.html/CabalWishlist
 * http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/hackage/ticket/89

Indeed, it would be great to avoid that double-compilation

-- 
Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow>
PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users

Reply via email to