On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 08:58:27AM +0000, Eric Kow wrote: > On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 17:30:09 +1100, Trent W. Buck wrote: > > I'll fix things that are release-critical or critical, but I've no > > interest in fixing minor bugs in the autoconf infrastructure. I've > > WONTFIXed some bugs in the BTS today for that reason. > > That's fine and good. But at present, there is actual autoconf > breakage in these patches. Would you have time to look into it > at the moment?
Ah, I misunderstood. I'll apply them, try to build with autoconf, and see what happens. > > > Without moving our infrastructure [...] there are no bots to verify > > > that our build system works, et cetera. [...] Let's just switch to > > > Cabal now, fix up the damage this does and then, if someone finds the > > > time in the following 4 or 5 months, fixes up autoconf. > > > > +1 to this approach. > > I am less than enthused, but I don't see this is worth resisting. I'd > like you two to field any incoming complaints if we go this route. Oh no, what have I done?! _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
