Eric Kow <[email protected]> writes: > This falls back to "false" (/bin/false on my machine) instead of setting > SENDMAIL to the empty string.
> Is this behaviour more desirable than the current behaviour of setting > it to the empty string? Are we relying on the current behaviour in any > way (the current code uses the empty string, as far as I can tell)? Don't really know, but it shouldn't matter either way. I just thought that runProcess "" isn't particularly well defined, so I put in something every POSIX system should have (we don't use the interface on win32). Yours, Petr. -- Peter Rockai | me()mornfall!net | prockai()redhat!com http://blog.mornfall.net | http://web.mornfall.net "In My Egotistical Opinion, most people's C programs should be indented six feet downward and covered with dirt." -- Blair P. Houghton on the subject of C program indentation _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
