On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 19:56:57 +0200, Dan Pascu wrote: > I agree. It's an absolute NO to impose someone's view on style on > everybody else.
Okay, that's three comments, all pointing in the same direction. Thanks all! > As for issue1000, how do you define a "strange" name and where do you > stop? Well, in the case of issue1000, I'll point out that the intention is not to trap user style errors, but to preserve user intention. That is, most likely, the user did not mean to enter '.' or '-l' as a patch name, so I think it's acceptable to do something. On the other hand, I also agree with the UI principle an undo mechanism is far better than a confirmation dialogue -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
