On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 09:33:51AM +0100, Thorkil Naur wrote: > I noticed that you have changed the description of the need-info > status on http://wiki.darcs.net/DarcsWiki/BugTrackerIssueManagement
Argh, sorry; I should have mentioned this earlier. A couple of weeks ago I started "cleaning up" the BTS documentation on the wiki, only to find that most of what I was writing was already covered on another page. Aaaand then I probably wandered off to get dinner and forgot all about it. If you want to just back out the changes I made, that's fine with me. > Thus narrowing the set of issues to be given [the need-info] > status. In particular, those issues that I would designate "need > investigation, not necessarily by the original reporter" now appear > to be home-less. In this group, I would include issues that need > some clear but significant work to be done, to investigate a > performance problem, for example. And also the wishlist issues that > we need to decide on, whether to support them or not. > > Possible statuses for these issues are: > > 1. The need-info status, as before, but then we need to change the > description > of that status. > 2. The need-volunteer status, again some change of the status description is > needed. > 3. A new need-investigation status. > 4. The chatting status. I would favour either (1) or (2), with a mild preference for (2) -- IIRC that was my intent when I made the change. > The last possibility is one that I would try to avoid, but it is > perhaps only the issue manager that gets affected by this, I cannot > say. And, there could be additional possibilities, of course. Agreed. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
