How bad is it to have an inconsistent repo? (Which is currently the case for happstack, as see below.)
For one thing, I suspect (though not 100% sure) that gitit in darcs mode has icky buggy behavior when the repo is inconsistent. Perhaps there are other problems well? Should patch-tag.com try to prevent repo inconsistencies? This is (maybe?) possible by running darcs check as a hook when getting pushed to, and rejecting patches if they would result in repo inconsistency... Assuming this is possible, is it desirable? PS I suggest replying to patch-tag-users public google group to keep the thread in one place :) ************ thart...@ubuntulaptop:~/tmp>darcs get [email protected]:/r/happstack Copying patches, to get lazy repository hit ctrl-C... Finished getting. thart...@ubuntulaptop:~/tmp>cd happstack/ thart...@ubuntulaptop:~/tmp/happstack>darcs check WARNING: Fixing removal of non-empty file ./happstack/templates/project/public/entries/new.html WARNING: Fixing removal of non-empty file ./happstack/templates/project/public/index.html Looks like we have a difference... Nothing Inconsistent repository! Found broken patches. -- Thomas Hartman Need somewhere to host your code? patch-tag.com Want to build a webapp? happstack.com _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
