Hi,

Eric Kow <[email protected]> writes:
> I wanted to give a gorsvet a spin, so I did:
>
>  cd /the/nfs-share
>  darcs get largish-repo tmp-largish-repo
>  cd tmp-largish-repo
>  gorsvet optimize
You should have gotten a lot of "writing foo" messages there already I guess?

>  gorsvet wh
>
> ... and then I got a lot of messages like
>
>   writing Hash (Just 
> 100,"97297b253db565d97588afb572bd0970963ccb660acffe0b4b8f13578a66825b")
>   writing Hash (Just 
> 98,"29d9a857b72af4f366e3d8f0e72738e0f28697cc4f87933b09e3b95190fbad40")
>   writing Hash (Just 
> 100,"967b56ccd1b9a6164cb369bdc2b4f81d0a57e4a8605c33db3333ea864b944123")
>
> Is that normal? I get it if I run it again, for what it's worth.
No, unless you changed lots of files since the last run. Something might be
wrong with the indexes or with timestamps on your machine. It's not a
big-endian box by any chance? I have only tested on x86 so far, no 64b or
anything. Also, the bug is almost certainly in hashed-storage, as gorsvet is
fairly thin by itself, at least as far as filesystem operations go.

I guess it'd be helpful to implement a way to dump the index. In the meantime,
you could tar up the whole repository (including _darcs/index) and upload it
somewhere. Thanks!

-- 
Peter Rockai | me()mornfall!net | prockai()redhat!com
 http://blog.mornfall.net | http://web.mornfall.net

"In My Egotistical Opinion, most people's C programs should be
 indented six feet downward and covered with dirt."
     -- Blair P. Houghton on the subject of C program indentation
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users

Reply via email to