zooko <[email protected]> writes: >>> Apparently such a version would require a _real_ cygwin ghc? > That would be ideal.
Call me Mr. Silly, but why is a Cygwin version of Darcs preferable to a native binary? Last time I looked at Windows (which was, admittedly, about six years ago) cygwin was a bloated, messy pile of confusing and unweildy junk -- and that if you could get a utility (e.g. bash or grep) as a stand-alone .exe, it was *much* easier to deploy. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
