Hi Thorkil, On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 22:28:37 +0100, Thorkil Naur wrote: > It turned out that resource consumption was still excessive, so I have > unpulled the change. In this process, I had to also reinstate a change by > kowey that added --verbose to the configure command.
I was wondering why there as an anonymous patch in the buildbot repository. :-D Generally speaking, it's not a good idea to unpull patches that have already been "published" to a public repository. It's safe in darcs terms, but very confusing in social terms. A better solution for this case would be to use "darcs rollback", which generates a new patch. Could you push back your patch (and my original patch), resolve the conflict with your version of my patch, and then possibly rollback the Setup patch? If that seemed too confusing, I could try to help walk you through it or do it myself when I have more darcs time. Thanks! (I was looking at the buildbot because I want too see the Windows buildslave building again, so that we can return to the original issue of the tests failing there...) -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
pgpScgw3AWF8g.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
