[email protected] (Trent W. Buck) writes: >> http://modeemi.fi/~tuomov/repos/ion-3/ > > This repo is in the legacy hashed format. I recommend you do a test > conversion to darcs-2 format and see if that improves matters. Hashed and darcs-2 formats are identical, performance-wise. The only difference is patch format. However, this repo is *not* in hashed format, so it could benefit (or suffer) from hashed/darcs-2 conversion.
> Note that checkpoints are not useful for repositories in darcs-2 format. And neither are they in (legacy) hashed format. Moreover, they are only useful for --partial checkouts, which break in other ways. I'd suggest not using them at all. Yours, Petr. -- Peter Rockai | me()mornfall!net | prockai()redhat!com http://blog.mornfall.net | http://web.mornfall.net "In My Egotistical Opinion, most people's C programs should be indented six feet downward and covered with dirt." -- Blair P. Houghton on the subject of C program indentation _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
