On Friday 06 March 2009, Eric Kow wrote: > Anyway there seems to be a consensus that implementing the flags > is OK for those who "know better". It makes me nervous, but I won't > fight it...
I do not claim to know better in this case. In fact I have not encountered so far a single case where I would want to allow conflicts when I push. OTOH, I see no reason to deny this ability to those who indeed "know better" because they have a use case that is more difficult without it. After all it's their repository and they can't blame darcs for pushing conflicts into a remote repository because they chose to allow it explicitly. As long as the default for push is --dont-allow-conflicts, I see no harm in such a move and it also doesn't make me nervous, because I know I won't change that default (at least not until I will discover a use case for it, in which case I should know exactly why I need it and what to expect from it). -- Dan _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
