[email protected] (Trent W. Buck) writes: > So my next question is: why does this particular process generate a > *gigabyte* of unnecessary inventories, and why didn't "darcs optimize" > clean them up? That might be because of optimise's cautiousness to not remove files that might be referenced by existing copies of the repo. Can you count the tags in the repository maybe? If there are many, that could explain a lot... Although it seems more likely that after every patch, a new file in inventories is created, which is a little suspicious... Probably worth filing a bug report, either way. But you are right, I have misremembered -- one needs to do a get instead of optimise to get rid of the junk.
Anyway, it seems that the actual resulting repo is of fairly usable size (and much smaller than those 330M of MoinMoin). Yours, Petr. -- Peter Rockai | me()mornfall!net | prockai()redhat!com http://blog.mornfall.net | http://web.mornfall.net "In My Egotistical Opinion, most people's C programs should be indented six feet downward and covered with dirt." -- Blair P. Houghton on the subject of C program indentation _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
