On Sat, Mar 07, 2009 at 21:27:40 +1100, Trent W. Buck wrote: > > Thanks Trent, here's some quick review. Background: > > http://bugs.darcs.net/issue1376 says
> > I'm sympathetic to building things right into the darcs binary when it > > eases building, deployment, and is not unuseful for users. Eg I'd like > > to build in some form of test runner. Your change indeed looks simple > > and should do what you want. I'm in favour of things that work for now > > even if not perfect. > > > > I'm uncomfortable with "darcs help manual" though because it's > > strictly to make cabal packaging easier Applied, thanks! Thanks too to Simon for the review (and attention to principles). I guess "darcs help manual" couldn't hurt. I hope we're not setting some sort of crazy precedent. -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
