Simon Michael <[email protected]> writes: > Trent W. Buck wrote: >> Hmm, I'm not sure how much simpler I can make it, short of translating >> the ABNF descriptions in RFC 2822 into English approximations. > > Aha! Good hint that the design is not yet right! > > I don't mean to be annoying. :-)
No worries. > I really am interested in using (real, end-user-targeted) > documentation to force the discovery of more elegant, lower-cost > designs. I'm not sure that "easy to explain" is (by itself) a reliable metric of "goodness". I mean, by analogy, it's a lot easier to explain trepanation than anticonvulsants to a patient, but the latter will probably be a better treatment for epilepsy. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
