On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 14:19:33 +0100, Petr Rockai wrote: > Although it might be cleaner to express that with something like > > if !flag(http) && !flag(curl) > buildable: False
That sounds a lot more straightforward to me. Do we get a nice error message as a result of this (where nice means that user understands what the next step is)? Even if not, I think we should probably go that route, since the non-buildabilty should only be triggered if the user does something explicit. Please submit a patch :-) -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
