On Sun, Mar 15, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Eric Kow <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Dmitry and Trent, > > Dmitry: could you take a quick look at this? It shouldn't be much > effort, just making sure I haven't done anything silly.
The patches look good to me. Regards, Dmitry > > On Sat, Mar 14, 2009 at 15:38:00 +1100, Trent W. Buck wrote: >> What effect does this actually have? Does this mean we can build Darcs >> binaries that have two separate HTTP client libraries linked in? > > Yes. There are some bits (HTTP post, I think) which are only > implemented with HTTP and not with libcurl. (A good follow-up question > is "why"?) > >> If so, which one gets used? > > My understanding of Darcs.URL is that if we have libcurl, we will just > libcurl whether or not we have HTTP. > > Also, as Petr pointed out, the patches to the darcs.cabal file address > the issue of requiring at least one HTTP library by making HTTP required > if -f-curl is specified. It's a bit obscure, though and Petr has > suggested what looks like a clearer route out. > > Anyway, I'll apply this bundle tomorrow if nobody submits a better > solution (or if nobody points out any flaws) > > -- > Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> > PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9 > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) > > iEYEARECAAYFAkm9HJsACgkQBUrOwgisBPnkpQCeKEDZTQJC01qbHTCnU2a/sTvO > AiEAnRhjygevI4p9SHnIHpiGfmNxyx+k > =qBh5 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
